Round Up Cancer Lawsuits

What is Roundup?

The use of Roundup, a herbicide containing glyphosate, has been widespread in the United States since the 1970s. It is primarily used by farmers, gardeners, and landscapers to control weeds. However, over the years, concerns about the safety of glyphosate have emerged. In 2015, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classified glyphosate as a probable human carcinogen, citing evidence of an increased risk of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma in people exposed to the chemical.

Class Action Lawsuits Against Monsanto/Bayer

As evidence of the risks associated with Roundup has grown, so too has the number of lawsuits against Monsanto (now owned by Bayer). In addition to individual lawsuits, there have been several class action lawsuits filed against the company. These lawsuits allege that Monsanto knew about the risks of glyphosate but failed to adequately warn the public or label its products. They also claim that the company engaged in false advertising by claiming that Roundup was safe and non-toxic.

One of the most significant Roundup class action lawsuits was filed in California in 2018. In that case, a jury awarded a couple $2 billion in damages after they both developed non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, which they claimed was caused by exposure to Roundup. The judge later reduced the award to $87 million, but the case sent a strong message to Bayer that it needed to take the Roundup issue seriously.

Following the California case, Bayer faced thousands of similar lawsuits across the United States. In 2020, the company agreed to a $10.9 billion settlement to resolve these lawsuits. The settlement covers individuals who have already filed lawsuits, as well as those who may file lawsuits in the future. It also includes funding for research into the safety of glyphosate and a new independent panel to review scientific evidence on the issue.

While the settlement is a positive development for those who have been harmed by Roundup, it does not absolve Bayer of responsibility for its actions. The company has faced criticism for its handling of the Roundup issue and for continuing to sell the product despite the mounting evidence of its risks. Some critics have also raised concerns about the independence of the panel that will review the scientific evidence on glyphosate.

Despite these criticisms, the Roundup class action lawsuits are an important example of how consumers can hold companies accountable for their actions. Class action lawsuits allow individuals who have been harmed by a company’s product or conduct to join together to sue the company as a group. This can be more efficient and cost-effective than each individual filing a separate lawsuit. It can also send a strong message to companies that they must prioritize public health and safety over profits.


In conclusion, the Roundup class action lawsuits demonstrate the importance of transparency and accountability in the development and marketing of products. While the lawsuits may not undo the harm caused by Roundup, they can provide some measure of justice for those who have been affected and send a message to other companies that they must prioritize safety above all else. It is important for companies to recognize the risks associated with their products and take appropriate steps to protect consumers from harm.